jeriendhal: (Default)
[personal profile] jeriendhal
Anyone know off the top their head what a reasonable time to complete a 5k run would be for a person who is healthy but not a trained athlete?

Date: 2008-02-05 10:03 pm (UTC)
kodi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kodi
20 minutes, I believe.

Date: 2008-02-05 10:11 pm (UTC)
kodi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kodi
Actually, I may have misinterpreted what you meant. 20 minutes is a good time for someone who runs a few times a week, and runs a 5k every month or so. 30 minutes is closer to what you'd get if you took someone who plays flag football on the weekends out to a 5k race.

Date: 2008-02-05 11:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] countrycousin.livejournal.com
There is a variety to "healthy but not a trained athlete".

trained athlete - under 5 min/mi

40ish non-athlete who runs regularly - 7 min/mi

healthy people who don't get enough aerobic exercise, and/or whose legs aren't used to the running - 9 or 10min/mi

5km is a bit under 3mi, about 2.8?

Date: 2008-02-06 04:42 am (UTC)
ext_5149: (Tundra)
From: [identity profile] mishalak.livejournal.com
5 km = 3.1 miles. So that would be 21 to thirty minutes.

Date: 2008-02-06 06:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sabledrake.livejournal.com
No clue ... it'd probably take me four hours, one instance of passing out, and a couple of bouts of puking.

Good luck though!

-- C.

Date: 2008-02-06 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] countrycousin.livejournal.com
ugh. so it is.

Date: 2008-02-06 01:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeriendhal.livejournal.com
And I'll probably add ten or fifteen minutes onto that, since in retrospect Rufus is not exactly healthy, though he's trying. (Seven years worth of steady drug and alcohol abuse will do that to you.)

Date: 2008-02-06 03:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] countrycousin.livejournal.com
Has he jogged 3 miles? This sort of thing is really easy to do - if you're healthy and work up to it. I was always trailing the pack in group runs while on active duty, but kept jogging and ran a couple of marathons later.

But starting out is a problem, and jogging 50 or 100 yards or so, walking a bit, doing it again until you've done a mile or so is a good way to start. Particularly when you get into your mid 30s, you don't recover as quickly, and the "no pain, no gain" philosophy should be discarded and the "pain, walk a bit" philosophy adopted.

Best of luck to him!

Date: 2008-02-06 04:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeriendhal.livejournal.com
Let's see. He's in his early thirties, and aside from the drug problem also suffered a traumatic field amputaion of his arm six weeks previously (did I mention this is a fictional character?) In his first attempt (when he's completely out of shape) I had it take him almost two hours. In retrospect I may shorten that a bit, even if he is wheezing all the way. I'm just writing the bit where he manages to jog the full 5 kilometers without having to either stop or throw up, so he gets a sense of accomplishment before I slam the door on him again. *evil grin*

Date: 2008-02-06 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] countrycousin.livejournal.com
heh. Well, your character seemed real to me. ;<)

OK - for someone capable of walking well, but not really fit, a 20 min/mile walk can be maintained - both legs and normal metabolism will sustain that. But the first time he might not do much better, alternately pushing himself and wheezing. But a lot of people know about 20 min/mi for a moderate walk, 15 min/mi for a quite brisk walk. Completely out of shape, he probably has trouble with a 20 min/mi walk, but trying to jog, probably doesn't do much worse.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 23rd, 2026 10:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios