Tell me why this wouldn't work
Jun. 15th, 2010 09:32 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Scenario: I win the Mega Millions, bigtime. The full $350 million, taken as a lump sum of say $250 million after taxes. Subtract another $50 million to pay for my dream house, every video game and toy I ever wanted, and trust funds for Georgia and Thomas so they never have to work a day in their lives if they live with reasonable care.
Take the remaining $200 million and divide it so:
$100 million would be used as interest free loans. No interest. At all. First come, first serve, limited to loans of $100,000 or less so it doesn't dissapear into the housing market. Length of time to pay is negotiable depending on the amount, but the loan recipient must put up at least 50% loan guarantees in the form of cash or physical assets. The catch is they will treated like any ordinary loan recipient if they default, and that the money is lmited pool. Once it's all given away, you'd have to go on a waiting list to recieve a loan as previous recipients pay their debts.
The other $100 million is held in conservative, long term investments. Profits from which go to pay for overhead such as loan officer salaries, advertising, ect. Any leftover profits at the end of the fiscal year are plowed into the loan fund to increase it.
So did I just reinvent someone's wheel, or have I just raised the ire of every Congressman who gets contributions from the loan industry?
Take the remaining $200 million and divide it so:
$100 million would be used as interest free loans. No interest. At all. First come, first serve, limited to loans of $100,000 or less so it doesn't dissapear into the housing market. Length of time to pay is negotiable depending on the amount, but the loan recipient must put up at least 50% loan guarantees in the form of cash or physical assets. The catch is they will treated like any ordinary loan recipient if they default, and that the money is lmited pool. Once it's all given away, you'd have to go on a waiting list to recieve a loan as previous recipients pay their debts.
The other $100 million is held in conservative, long term investments. Profits from which go to pay for overhead such as loan officer salaries, advertising, ect. Any leftover profits at the end of the fiscal year are plowed into the loan fund to increase it.
So did I just reinvent someone's wheel, or have I just raised the ire of every Congressman who gets contributions from the loan industry?
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 03:07 pm (UTC)Legal as a private business/non-profit. If you sold stock the SEC would stomp you for not making profits for the shareholders.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-15 03:41 pm (UTC)